Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dc7ea/dc7eae8dfcdf015ab3f3221abf91ebb5af0f0aea" alt="Samsung GX-10 front Samsung GX-10 front"
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Released September 2006
- Refreshed by Samsung GX-20
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung GX-10, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the sensor resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and GX-10 (10MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
The VG-160 was launched 5 years later than the GX-10 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before getting into a complete comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VG-160 matches up against the GX-10 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung GX-10. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung GX-10
VG-160 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | January 2012 | ![]() | September 2006 | Fresher by 65 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 210k | Clearer display (+20k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus VG-160
GX-10 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung GX-10
VG-160 | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-10 has specifications of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") having a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Below is a front view over all size comparison of the VG-160 and the GX-10.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/22cf8/22cf84b82a882b4fb29125085da451e463cd512f" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and GX-10 is 96 and 59 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2b20f/2b20fe5caf413c30ad8545dfd89493cd4593a927" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its tough to imagine the difference between sensor sizing merely by checking specs. The visual underneath will provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and GX-10.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field harder and the Olympus VG-160 will give more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The more modern VG-160 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3ba45/3ba456b8635850683fad2982493e81177eeba686" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de2eb/de2eb4b9af8ae0e0ec37f092684319a7d9682de4" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung GX-10 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2006-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 230k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 793g (1.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Retail pricing | $90 | $850 |