Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Announced January 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB600
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung HZ30W, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the HZ30W (12MP) is fairly comparable and they use the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VG-160 was unveiled 2 years after the HZ30W which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VG-160 matches up against the HZ30W in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung HZ30W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Samsung HZ30W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung HZ30W
| VG-160 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ30W over the Olympus VG-160
| HZ30W | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung HZ30W
| VG-160 | HZ30W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurement |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | The same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 provides outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Samsung HZ30W has measurements of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung HZ30W in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the VG-160 versus the HZ30W.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and HZ30W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor dimensions merely by checking out technical specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and HZ30W.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to show extra detail having an extra 2MP. Greater resolution will help you crop pics far more aggressively. The fresher VG-160 provides an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ30W Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung HZ30W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung HZ30W |
| Also called | - | WB600 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2010-01-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 230k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 245 grams (0.54 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SC/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $90 | $280 |
