Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Launched June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Here, we are reviewing the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung HZ35W, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VG-160 was unveiled 20 months later than the HZ35W making them a generation apart from each other. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a thorough comparison, here is a short view of how the VG-160 matches up against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung HZ35W
| VG-160 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2012 |  | June 2010 | More recent by 20 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VG-160
| HZ35W | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Display resolution | 614k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung HZ35W
| VG-160 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has specifications of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the VG-160 and the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and HZ35W is 96 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is difficult to visualise the gap between sensor measurements just by going over a spec sheet. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and HZ35W.
Clearly, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to deliver more detail having an extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The younger VG-160 will have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also called | - | WB650 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-01-10 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 245 gr (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photos | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $90 | $300 |