Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
86 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Launched January 2013
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and NX300M (20MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and NX300M (APS-C) provide totally different sensor measurements.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-160 was announced 11 months before the NX300M so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300M being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the VG-160 scores vs the NX300M with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 & Samsung NX300M. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Samsung NX300M Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung NX300M
| VG-160 | NX300M |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300M over the Olympus VG-160
| NX300M | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 | January 2012 | Newer by 11 months | |
| Focus manually | More accurate focus | |||
| Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
| Screen size | 3.3" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 768k | 230k | Sharper screen (+538k dot) | |
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung NX300M
| VG-160 | NX300M | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M Physical Comparison
If you're planning to travel with your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 comes with physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung NX300M has specifications of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") accompanied by a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the VG-160 versus the NX300M.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and NX300M is 96 and 86 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M Sensor Comparison
More often than not, its tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions merely by seeing a spec sheet. The picture underneath should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and NX300M.
Clearly, both the cameras feature different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX300M will provide greater detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots way more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung NX300M Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung NX300M | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung NX300M |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-01-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | DRIMe IV |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 25600 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 247 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 32 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3.3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 9.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 331g (0.73 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 pictures | 330 pictures |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | BP1130 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $90 | $699 |