Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
94 Imaging
34 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F3.4-5.8) lens
- 168g - 95 x 59 x 23mm
- Announced February 2009
- Other Name is IT100
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820 Overview
In this article, we are reviewing the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung SL820, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the SL820 (12MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VG-160 was launched 2 years after the SL820 which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the VG-160 grades versus the SL820 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung SL820. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Samsung SL820 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung SL820
| VG-160 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 36 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL820 over the Olympus VG-160
| SL820 | VG-160 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung SL820
| VG-160 | SL820 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 has exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung SL820 has measurements of 95mm x 59mm x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") having a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung SL820 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Here is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 vs the SL820.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and SL820 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to picture the contrast in sensor sizes just by checking out a spec sheet. The picture underneath might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and SL820.
As you can see, both the cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to show extra detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more modern VG-160 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung SL820 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung SL820 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung SL820 |
| Also Known as | - | IT100 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.4-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | 4.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lb) | 168g (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 95 x 59 x 23mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch cost | $90 | $280 |