Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
96 Imaging
40 Features
30 Overall
36
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Announced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-125mm (F2.5-6.3) lens
- 114g - 94 x 58 x 18mm
- Launched January 2013
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F Overview
In this article, we are looking at the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung ST150F, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the ST150F (16MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VG-160 was launched 12 months earlier than the ST150F which means that they are both of a similar generation. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the VG-160 scores vs the ST150F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung ST150F. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Samsung ST150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung ST150F
| VG-160 | ST150F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung ST150F over the Olympus VG-160
| ST150F | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | January 2013 |  | January 2012 | Fresher by 12 months |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung ST150F
| VG-160 | ST150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display measurements |
| Display resolution | 230k |  | 230k | Identical display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Neither features Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys physical dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Samsung ST150F has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 114 grams (0.25 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung ST150F in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you select at that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the VG-160 versus the ST150F.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and ST150F is 96 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's tough to envision the contrast in sensor sizing simply by viewing specifications. The photograph below will help give you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and ST150F.
Plainly, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but not the same megapixels. You should expect to see the Samsung ST150F to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The older VG-160 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung ST150F Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung ST150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung ST150F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2012-01-10 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | - |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-125mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 1s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.80 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 114g (0.25 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 94 x 58 x 18mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 images | - |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | microSD/microSDHC/microSDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $90 | $300 |
