Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced February 2010
- Alternate Name is WB2000
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and TL350 (10MP) but they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-160 was brought out 23 months later than the TL350 making the cameras a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the VG-160 grades against the TL350 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 & Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung TL350
| VG-160 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2012 |  | February 2010 | Fresher by 23 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Olympus VG-160
| TL350 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung TL350
| VG-160 | TL350 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 provides exterior measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has proportions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check the Olympus VG-160 versus Samsung TL350 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that moment. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the VG-160 compared to the TL350.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and TL350 is 96 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to see the difference in sensor sizing simply by researching a spec sheet. The visual below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and TL350.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You can anticipate the Olympus VG-160 to result in greater detail having its extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics much more aggressively. The more recent VG-160 is going to have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Samsung TL350 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Samsung TL350 |
| Alternate name | - | WB2000 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2010-02-20 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 5.20 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 195g (0.43 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-70B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $90 | $400 |