Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Samsung WB350F front
Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
46
Overall
42

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Samsung WB350F
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
  • 276g - 114 x 65 x 25mm
  • Revealed January 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F Overview

In this write-up, we will be comparing the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the WB350F (16MP) is relatively similar and they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

The VG-160 was introduced 24 months prior to the WB350F which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).

Before diving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a short summation of how the VG-160 scores against the WB350F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photography Glossary

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Samsung WB350F

 VG-160 WB350F 

Reasons to pick Samsung WB350F over the Olympus VG-160

 WB350F VG-160 
RevealedJanuary 2014January 2012Fresher by 24 months
Manual focus Dial precise focus
Screen resolution460k230kClearer screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Samsung WB350F

 VG-160 WB350F 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen measurement
Selfie screen No selfie screen

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F Physical Comparison

In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will need to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VG-160 comes with physical measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Samsung WB350F has proportions of 114mm x 65mm x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 276 grams (0.61 lbs).

Check the Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilising at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the WB350F.

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F size comparison

Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and WB350F is 96 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F Sensor Comparison

Often, it's hard to envision the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading specs. The graphic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and WB350F.

All in all, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Samsung WB350F to deliver more detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures a little more aggressively. The older VG-160 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography details
Samsung WB350F Portrait photography details
33
good megapixels (14MP)
provides face detection focusing
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual exposure
can't use external flash
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
40
you can focus manually
decent MP (16 megapixels)
external flash not possible
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography factors
Samsung WB350F Street photography factors
56
lighter than competitors (125g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
61
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
no moving screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-160
Sports photography with Samsung WB350F
26
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery (165 shots)
has no phase detect AF
50
excellent zoom range (23-483mm 21.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect auto focus
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
Travel photography with Samsung WB350F
65
lighter than competitors (125g)
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
relatively wide (26mm)
does not have Time Lapse recording
terrible battery (165 CIPA)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
69
lighter than competitors in class (276 grams)
decent MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
pretty wide (23mm)
very long reach (483mm)
no Time Lapse mode
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-160
Landscape photography with Samsung WB350F
36
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
good megapixels (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual exposure
no image stabilization
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW format
terrible battery (165 CIPA)
does not have Time Lapse recording
50
you can focus manually
pretty wide (23mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
image stabilization (Optical)
decent MP (16MP)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW format
no Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus VG-160
Vlogging with Samsung WB350F
30
relatively wide (26mm)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than competitors (125 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 resolution)
does not have external mic port
34
pretty wide (23mm)
touchscreen functionality
image stabilization (Optical)
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competitors in class (276g)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't posses selfie friendly screen
no external mic socket
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Olympus VG-160 vs Samsung WB350F Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Samsung WB350F
 Olympus VG-160Samsung WB350F
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model type Olympus VG-160 Samsung WB350F
Type Small Sensor Compact Small Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-01-10 2014-01-07
Physical type Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4608 x 3456
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW files
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 23-483mm (21.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8-5.9
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 3"
Resolution of screen 230k dots 460k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 16 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.80 m -
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in -
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 lb) 276g (0.61 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 114 x 65 x 25mm (4.5" x 2.6" x 1.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 photos -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B SLB-10A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) -
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $90 $260