Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f42c9/f42c9a361334ffc5c5c43c170deef3b574f4dd47" alt="Sigma DP2 Quattro front Sigma DP2 Quattro front"
70 Imaging
63 Features
38 Overall
53
Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- 45mm (F2.8) lens
- 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
- Announced February 2014
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
The VG-160 was revealed 3 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the VG-160 matches up against the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 and Sigma DP2 Quattro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Sigma DP2 Quattro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro
VG-160 | DP2 Quattro |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VG-160
DP2 Quattro | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | February 2014 | ![]() | January 2012 | Fresher by 25 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial accurate focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
VG-160 | DP2 Quattro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither contains Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 has got outside measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the DP2 Quattro.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1511a/1511ad3f3348075894a61a99d6617b7d051d8cf0" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be0ed/be0ed9d6d13d7d3b177a2b1da0fb1794967202a9" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and DP2 Quattro.
All in all, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older VG-160 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5ef7d/5ef7d2e88e8af19e394a3aef7dca1dd3d13c286f" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09d32/09d3242d041bd86f4cf73a575726055216b52379" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Sigma DP2 Quattro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Sigma DP2 Quattro |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | TRUE III engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5424 x 3616 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 45mm (1x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 395 gr (0.87 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 pictures | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-70B | BP-51 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $90 | $931 |