Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Announced February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

Its time to look closer at the Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a sizeable gap among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and DP2 Quattro (20MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) use totally different sensor measurements.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VG-160 was revealed 3 years before the DP2 Quattro and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before delving through a detailed comparison, below is a short summation of how the VG-160 matches up against the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VG-160 DP2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Olympus VG-160

 DP2 Quattro VG-160 
AnnouncedFebruary 2014January 2012Fresher by 25 months
Manually focus Dial accurate focus
Display resolution920k230kCrisper display (+690k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 VG-160 DP2 Quattro 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display measurements
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to carry your camera often, you should factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 has got outside measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has sizing of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Look at the Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. The following is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the DP2 Quattro.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and DP2 Quattro is 96 and 70 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through specs. The photograph underneath will give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the VG-160 and DP2 Quattro.

All in all, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 with its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render extra detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The older VG-160 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VG-160
Portrait photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
33
MP count good (14MP)
comes with face detect autofocus
focusing manually not possible
lack of manual mode
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
77
you can focus manually
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
provides face detection focusing
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography factors
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography factors
56
lighter than competition (125 grams)
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
61
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
no image stabilization
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography advice
26
MP count good (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (165 per charge)
lack of phase detect autofocus
48
MP count good (20MP)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames/s)
no image stabilization
does not have phase detect AF
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Travel photography features
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography features
65
lighter than competition (125g)
MP count good (14MP)
flash built-in
relatively wide (26mm)
missing Time Lapse mode
terrible battery pack (165 CIPA)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
53
MP count good (20 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Landscape photography camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Landscape photography camera
36
relatively wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3")
MP count good (14MP)
focusing manually not possible
can't swap lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
lack of manual mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
terrible battery pack (165 per charge)
missing Time Lapse mode
59
you can focus manually
screen is a good size (3 inches)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
nice sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no image stabilization
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma DP2 Quattro as a Vlogging camera
30
relatively wide (26mm)
comes with face detect autofocus
lighter than competition (125g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic jack
9
no video recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus VG-160 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Olympus VG-160Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Company Olympus Sigma
Model type Olympus VG-160 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Type Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Compact
Introduced 2012-01-10 2014-02-13
Body design Compact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CCD CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 20MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 5424 x 3616
Maximum native ISO 1600 6400
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 45mm (1x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display technology TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.80 m no built-in flash
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video file format Motion JPEG -
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lbs) 395 gr (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 pictures -
Battery format Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC -
Storage slots One One
Price at launch $90 $931