Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A290 front
Portability
66
Imaging
54
Features
47
Overall
51

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sony A290
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
  • Launched June 2010
  • Superseded the Sony A230
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 Overview

Below is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VG-160 and Sony A290, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the A290 (14MP) is pretty similar but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and A290 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

The VG-160 was announced 20 months later than the A290 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony A290 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the VG-160 matches up versus the A290 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony A290

 VG-160 A290 
LaunchedJanuary 2012June 2010More recent by 20 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A290 over the Olympus VG-160

 A290 VG-160 
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony A290

 VG-160 A290 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen resolution230k230kIdentical screen resolution
Selfie screen Neither offers selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 offers outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony A290 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") with a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).

See the Olympus VG-160 and Sony A290 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using during that time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 versus the A290.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and A290 is 96 and 66 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, its tough to visualize the gap between sensor measurements just by reading specs. The photograph here should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and A290.

All in all, each of these cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The VG-160 contains the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field harder. The more recent VG-160 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography info
Sony A290 Portrait photography info
34
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
offers face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual mode not possible
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
65
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
offers face detection autofocus
delivers RAW formats
no liveview
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography advice
Sony A290 Street photography advice
56
lighter than competition (125g)
no moving screen
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
66
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen does not articulate
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography information
Sony A290 Sports photography information
27
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
not so great battery (165 CIPA)
lacks phase detect autofocus
55
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
bad battery life (290 per charge)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus VG-160
Travel photography with Sony A290
66
lighter than competition (125 grams)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
really wide (26mm)
lack of Timelapse recording
not so great battery (165 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
53
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
built-in flash
no Time Lapse mode
bad battery life (290 shots)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography features
Sony A290 Landscape photography features
37
really wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inch)
decent sensor resolution (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not possible
no image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW support
not so great battery (165 per charge)
lack of Timelapse recording
58
manual focus
change lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (14MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
screen is small (2.7 inches)
no liveview
bad battery life (290 per charge)
no Time Lapse mode
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging features
Sony A290 Vlogging features
30
really wide (26mm)
offers face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (125g)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video resolution low (1280 x 720 pixels)
lack of external microphone socket
9
lack of video recording
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A290 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony A290
 Olympus VG-160Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VG-160 Sony Alpha DSLR-A290
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Revealed 2012-01-10 2010-06-09
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14MP 14MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3056
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Lowest native ISO 80 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3" 2.7"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate - 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 10.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 lbs) 549g (1.21 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 66
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.5
DXO Low light rating not tested 615
Other
Battery life 165 images 290 images
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-70B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo, SD/SDHC
Card slots 1 1
Pricing at release $90 $600