Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A330 front
Portability
67
Imaging
50
Features
50
Overall
50

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Released January 2012
Sony A330
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 529g - 128 x 97 x 71mm
  • Launched May 2009
  • Superseded the Sony A300
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 Overview

Here is a thorough comparison of the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony A330, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and A330 (10MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and A330 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The VG-160 was unveiled 2 years later than the A330 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony A330 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before delving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a short highlight of how the VG-160 scores vs the A330 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony A330

 VG-160 A330 
LaunchedJanuary 2012May 2009Fresher by 33 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A330 over the Olympus VG-160

 A330 VG-160 
Manual focus More exact focus
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony A330

 VG-160 A330 
Screen resolution230k230kThe same screen resolution
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 Physical Comparison

If you're planning to carry your camera often, you should think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 has got external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony A330 has dimensions of 128mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8") and a weight of 529 grams (1.17 lbs).

See the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony A330 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you select at that moment. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 against the A330.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and A330 is 96 and 67 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 Sensor Comparison

Often, it is very hard to see the difference between sensor sizing simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The graphic below might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and A330.

Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 using its tinier sensor will make getting shallower DOF harder and the Olympus VG-160 will offer you more detail having an extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer VG-160 is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus VG-160
Portrait photography with Sony A330
34
good MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detect focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not available
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
62
focusing manually
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect focus
saves RAW files
low resolution (10 megapixels)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography factors
Sony A330 Street photography factors
56
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
75
has a tilting screen
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Sports photography camera
Sony A330 as a Sports photography camera
27
good MP (14MP)
no shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
low battery (165 CIPA)
lacks phase detect AF
50
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
low resolution (10MP)
terrible battery (230 per charge)
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Travel photography highlights
Sony A330 Travel photography highlights
66
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
good MP (14 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (26mm)
doesn't have Timelapse function
low battery (165 per charge)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
44
flash built-in
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
terrible battery (230 shots)
low resolution (10 megapixels)
display isn't selfie friendly
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Landscape photography advice
Sony A330 Landscape photography advice
37
decently wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3")
good MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not available
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
low battery (165 shots)
doesn't have Timelapse function
54
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
tiny screen (2.7")
low resolution (10 megapixels)
terrible battery (230 CIPA)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A330 as a Vlogging camera
30
decently wide (26mm)
comes with face detect focusing
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 resolution)
doesn't have microphone support
9
no video recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony A330
 Olympus VG-160Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VG-160 Sony Alpha DSLR-A330
Type Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Released 2012-01-10 2009-05-18
Physical type Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Macro focus range 7cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of display 230k dots 230k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting rate - 3.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.80 m 10.00 m
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) -
Max video resolution 1280x720 None
Video data format Motion JPEG -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125g (0.28 lbs) 529g (1.17 lbs)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 128 x 97 x 71mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 64
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.4
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 535
Other
Battery life 165 photos 230 photos
Battery type Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B NP-FH50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage type SD/SDHC SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo
Card slots Single Single
Price at launch $90 $545