Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350

Portability
96
Imaging
38
Features
26
Overall
33
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A350 front
Portability
62
Imaging
53
Features
47
Overall
50

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Announced January 2012
Sony A350
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Tilting Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 674g - 131 x 99 x 75mm
  • Introduced June 2008
  • Refreshed by Sony A380
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 Overview

Let's examine more closely at the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the A350 (14MP) is pretty well matched but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and A350 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor dimensions.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The VG-160 was brought out 3 years after the A350 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony A350 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before going through a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the VG-160 grades against the A350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony A350

 VG-160 A350 
IntroducedJanuary 2012June 2008More modern by 44 months
Screen sizing3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")

Reasons to pick Sony A350 over the Olympus VG-160

 A350 VG-160 
Focus manually Very precise focusing
Screen typeTiltingFixed Tilting screen

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony A350

 VG-160 A350 
Screen resolution230k230kExact same screen resolution
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Lacking Touch friendly screen

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 Physical Comparison

In case you're intending to carry around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 comes with exterior dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) whilst the Sony A350 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0") and a weight of 674 grams (1.49 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the VG-160 compared to the A350.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and A350 is 96 and 62 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 Sensor Comparison

In many cases, it is tough to see the difference between sensor sizes only by reading through specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and A350.

As you can plainly see, both cameras offer the same exact resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The VG-160 includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF more difficult. The more modern VG-160 will have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography information
Sony A350 Portrait photography information
34
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focus
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
71
you can focus manually
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Street photography camera
Sony A350 as a Street photography camera
56
lighter than competition in class (125g)
fixed screen
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
66
screen tilts
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
more heavy than competitors in class (674 grams)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography info
Sony A350 Sports photography info
27
megapixel count decent (14 megapixels)
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
bad battery power (165 per charge)
does not have phase detect auto focus
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
sensor has phase detect AF
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames per second)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Travel photography information
Sony A350 Travel photography information
66
lighter than competition in class (125g)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
flash built-in
reasonably wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse mode
bad battery power (165 shots)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
51
good megapixels (14MP)
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
more heavy than competitors in class (674g)
display isn't selfie friendly
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony A350 as a Landscape photography camera
37
reasonably wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
megapixel count decent (14MP)
lack of manual focus
can't swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
no image stabilization
sensor size is small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
bad battery power (165 CIPA)
does not have Timelapse mode
64
you can focus manually
switch lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
good megapixels (14MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
small screen (2.7")
missing Timelapse mode
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Vlogging camera
Sony A350 as a Vlogging camera
30
reasonably wide (26mm)
offers face detection focus
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
somewhat slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
no image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
does not have external microphone jack
9
no video recording
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A350 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony A350
 Olympus VG-160Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VG-160 Sony Alpha DSLR-A350
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2012-01-10 2008-06-06
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 14 megapixel
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 4592 x 3056
Maximum native ISO 1600 3200
Minimum native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
AF single
AF tracking
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Number of focus points - 9
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Max aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Macro focus range 7cm -
Number of lenses - 143
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Tilting
Display size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Display resolution 230 thousand dot 230 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.49x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed - 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range 4.80 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) -
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 None
Video format Motion JPEG -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125g (0.28 pounds) 674g (1.49 pounds)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 131 x 99 x 75mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 3.0")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested 65
DXO Color Depth score not tested 22.6
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 11.5
DXO Low light score not tested 595
Other
Battery life 165 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC Compact Flash (Type I or II), Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, UDMA Mode 5, Supports FAT12 / FAT16 / FAT32
Storage slots 1 1
Price at launch $90 $600