Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Alpha a3500 front
Portability
69
Imaging
63
Features
54
Overall
59

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Launched January 2012
Sony a3500
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 16000
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony E Mount
  • 411g - 128 x 91 x 85mm
  • Launched March 2014
  • Previous Model is Sony A3000
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 Overview

Below, we are matching up the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sony. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and a3500 (20MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and a3500 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizes.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The VG-160 was unveiled 3 years before the a3500 which is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony a3500 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.

Before getting in to a detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the VG-160 matches up against the a3500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony a3500

 VG-160 a3500 

Reasons to pick Sony a3500 over the Olympus VG-160

 a3500 VG-160 
LaunchedMarch 2014January 2012Newer by 26 months
Manually focus Very accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony a3500

 VG-160 a3500 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Display dimension3"3"Identical display dimensions
Display resolution230k230kSame display resolution
Selfie screen Neither has selfie screen
Touch display Neither has Touch display

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you are going to need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 has outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony a3500 has specifications of 128mm x 91mm x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 411 grams (0.91 lbs).

Examine the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 compared to the a3500.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and a3500 is 96 and 69 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 Sensor Comparison

Typically, it can be tough to visualise the difference between sensor dimensions purely by looking at technical specs. The image underneath will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and a3500.

As you can tell, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VG-160 having a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh trickier and the Sony a3500 will give you greater detail having an extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography features
Sony a3500 Portrait photography features
33
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
no manual control
can't use external flash
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
77
manual focus
decent MP (20MP)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features face detect focusing
saves RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus VG-160
Street photography with Sony a3500
56
lighter than others (125g)
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
57
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
heavier than average in class (411g)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-160
Sports photography with Sony a3500
26
decent megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
bad battery (165 per charge)
lacks phase detect AF
60
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
features tracking focus
better than average battery (470 shots)
max frames per second very slow (4.0 fps)
no image stabilization
doesn't have phase detect AF
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Travel photography camera
Sony a3500 as a Travel photography camera
65
lighter than others (125 grams)
decent megapixels (14MP)
flash built-in
pretty wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse mode
bad battery (165 CIPA)
screen is not selfie friendly
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
60
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
decent MP (20MP)
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse mode
heavier than average in class (411g)
screen isn't selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-160
Landscape photography with Sony a3500
36
pretty wide (26mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
decent megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
no manual control
does not have image stabilization
sensor is small (1/2.3")
lacks RAW files
bad battery (165 CIPA)
missing Timelapse mode
70
manual focus
swap lenses (Sony E mount)
screen size is good (3 inch)
decent MP (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (APS-C)
saves RAW files
better than average battery (470 CIPA)
no image stabilization
missing Time Lapse mode
Photography Glossary

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging highlights
Sony a3500 Vlogging highlights
30
pretty wide (26mm)
comes with face detection focusing
lighter than others (125 grams)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.8)
screen is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low quality video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone support
26
features face detect focusing
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
screen isn't selfie friendly
no image stabilization
missing mic socket
heavier than average in class (411g)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony a3500 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony a3500
 Olympus VG-160Sony Alpha a3500
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VG-160 Sony Alpha a3500
Class Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level Mirrorless
Launched 2012-01-10 2014-03-21
Physical type Compact SLR-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - BIONZ image
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 4288 x 3216 5456 x 3632
Maximum native ISO 1600 16000
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW data
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
AF continuous
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens Sony E
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) -
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 -
Macro focus range 7cm -
Total lenses - 121
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3" 3"
Screen resolution 230 thousand dots 230 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch display
Screen technology TFT Color LCD TFT LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.47x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 4.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 4.80 m 6.00 m (at ISO200 / 4m at ISO100)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Flash off, Auto flash, Fill-flash, Slow Sync., Rear Sync.
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash synchronize - 1/160 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080
Maximum video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video format Motion JPEG AVCHD, H.264
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 gr (0.28 lb) 411 gr (0.91 lb)
Dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 128 x 91 x 85mm (5.0" x 3.6" x 3.3")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 images 470 images
Type of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2-sec. or 10-sec. delay)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC -
Card slots One One
Pricing at launch $90 $398