Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
62 Imaging
45 Features
41 Overall
43
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Released January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-1550mm (F3.4-6.5) lens
- 628g - 130 x 95 x 122mm
- Released February 2014
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400 Overview
Following is a extended overview of the Olympus VG-160 and Sony H400, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and H400 (20MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-160 was introduced 3 years before the H400 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony H400 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the VG-160 matches up vs the H400 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Sony H400 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony H400
VG-160 | H400 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony H400 over the Olympus VG-160
H400 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 25 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony H400
VG-160 | H400 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither includes Touch friendly display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Olympus VG-160 features outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony H400 has specifications of 130mm x 95mm x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") with a weight of 628 grams (1.38 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VG-160 and Sony H400 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you use at that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the VG-160 compared to the H400.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and H400 is 96 and 62 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to see the gap between sensor sizes simply by reviewing a spec sheet. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and H400.
Clearly, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can anticipate the Sony H400 to deliver more detail using its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony H400 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H400 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-13 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz(R) |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5152 x 3864 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-1550mm (62.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.4-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 7cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | Clear Photo LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 201k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 8.80 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Flash On, Slow Synchro, Flash Off, Advanced Flash |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 X 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125g (0.28 lbs) | 628g (1.38 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 130 x 95 x 122mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 4.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 photos | 300 photos |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (Off, 10 sec, 2 sec, portrait1, portrait2) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick PRO Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $90 | $268 |