Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
92 Imaging
51 Features
44 Overall
48
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- " Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
- 179g - 63 x 63 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2013
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100 Overview
Here is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VG-160 and Sony QX100, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Lens-style by brands Olympus and Sony. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and QX100 (20MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and QX100 (1") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VG-160 was brought out 20 months earlier than the QX100 making the cameras a generation apart from one another. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony QX100 being a Lens-style camera.
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a short view of how the VG-160 matches up against the QX100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VG-160 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Sony QX100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony QX100
VG-160 | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | " | Larger display (+3") | |
Display resolution | 230k | 0k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony QX100 over the Olympus VG-160
QX100 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | September 2013 | January 2012 | Fresher by 20 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony QX100
VG-160 | QX100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 enjoys outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony QX100 has sizing of 63mm x 63mm x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") and a weight of 179 grams (0.39 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-160 and Sony QX100 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is the front view scale comparison of the VG-160 against the QX100.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and QX100 is 96 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reading through technical specs. The graphic below will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and QX100.
As you have seen, each of these cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 because of its tinier sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field tougher and the Sony QX100 will give you greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images far more aggressively. The older VG-160 is going to be behind in sensor technology.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony QX100 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-QX100 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Lens-style |
Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2013-09-05 |
Body design | Compact | Lens-style |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-100mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-4.9 |
Macro focus range | 7cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inches | - |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 0k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | Depends on connected smartphone |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | None |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 grams (0.28 lb) | 179 grams (0.39 lb) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 63 x 63 x 56mm (2.5" x 2.5" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 pictures | 200 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | NP-BN, |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 secs) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC, Memory Stick Micro |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $90 | $268 |