Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III front
Portability
53
Imaging
52
Features
77
Overall
62

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Revealed January 2012
Sony RX10 III
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - 1" Sensor
  • 3" Tilting Display
  • ISO 125 - 12800 (Boost to 25600)
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 3840 x 2160 video
  • 24-600mm (F2.4-4.0) lens
  • 1051g - 133 x 94 x 127mm
  • Announced March 2016
  • Replaced the Sony RX10 II
  • Renewed by Sony RX10 IV
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III Overview

Here, we are contrasting the Olympus VG-160 and Sony RX10 III, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference among the sensor resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and RX10 III (20MP) and the VG-160 (1/2.3") and RX10 III (1") provide totally different sensor measurements.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The VG-160 was launched 5 years prior to the RX10 III and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony RX10 III being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.

Before we go right into a in-depth comparison, here is a brief introduction of how the VG-160 grades versus the RX10 III in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony RX10 III

 VG-160 RX10 III 

Reasons to pick Sony RX10 III over the Olympus VG-160

 RX10 III VG-160 
AnnouncedMarch 2016January 2012More recent by 51 months
Focus manually More accurate focusing
Display typeTiltingFixed Tilting display
Display resolution1229k230kClearer display (+999k dot)

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony RX10 III

 VG-160 RX10 III 
Display size3"3"Same display measurements
Selfie screen No selfie screen
Touch friendly display No Touch friendly display

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III Physical Comparison

If you're looking to lug around your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 has got outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony RX10 III has measurements of 133mm x 94mm x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0") with a weight of 1051 grams (2.32 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VG-160 and Sony RX10 III in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the VG-160 compared to the RX10 III.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III size comparison

Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VG-160 and RX10 III is 96 and 53 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III Sensor Comparison

Generally, it can be difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor measurements simply by going through a spec sheet. The visual here might provide you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and RX10 III.

Clearly, each of the cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The VG-160 because of its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field more difficult and the Sony RX10 III will show greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop images a good deal more aggressively. The older VG-160 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography factors
Sony RX10 III Portrait photography factors
33
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
offers face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual mode not available
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
71
manual focus
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
offers face detection autofocus
supports RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography details
Sony RX10 III Street photography details
56
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
screen is fixed
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
64
has a tilting screen
has image stabilization (Optical)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports RAW files
environment proofing
more heavy than competition in class (1,051g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Sports photography advice
Sony RX10 III Sports photography advice
26
good megapixels (14MP)
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
bad battery power (165 CIPA)
has no phase detect AF
70
amazing zoom range (24-600mm 25.0 x zoom)
quiet shutter (1/32,000s)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
offers tracking autofocus
environment proofing
great battery pack (420 per charge)
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Travel photography camera
Sony RX10 III as a Travel photography camera
65
lighter than competition in class (125 grams)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
built-in flash
fairly wide (26mm)
no Time Lapse recording
bad battery power (165 CIPA)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
55
great battery pack (420 per charge)
environment proofing
resolution is good (20MP)
has built in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
long zoom (600mm)
lack of Timelapse function
more heavy than competition in class (1,051g)
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Olympus VG-160
Landscape photography with Sony RX10 III
36
fairly wide (26mm)
screen size is good (3 inches)
good megapixels (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
manual mode not available
lack of image stabilization
small sensor (1/2.3")
has no RAW files
bad battery power (165 shots)
no Time Lapse recording
63
manual focus
fairly wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
resolution is good (20 megapixels)
sensor size is decent (1")
supports RAW files
environment proofing
great battery pack (420 CIPA)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
lack of Timelapse function
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging features
Sony RX10 III Vlogging features
30
fairly wide (26mm)
offers face detection focusing
lighter than competition in class (125g)
sluggish max aperture (f2.8)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 resolution)
no external mic support
28
fairly wide (24mm)
has image stabilization (Optical)
offers face detection autofocus
high res video (3840 x 2160 resolution)
does have external microphone socket
slow maximum aperture (f2.4)
display isn't selfie friendly
more heavy than competition in class (1,051g)
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony RX10 III Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony RX10 III
 Olympus VG-160Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
General Information
Company Olympus Sony
Model Olympus VG-160 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX10 III
Category Small Sensor Compact Large Sensor Superzoom
Revealed 2012-01-10 2016-03-29
Physical type Compact SLR-like (bridge)
Sensor Information
Powered by - Bionz X
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 13.2 x 8.8mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 116.2mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixels 20 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4288 x 3216 5472 x 3648
Highest native ISO 1600 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 80 125
RAW pictures
Min enhanced ISO - 64
Autofocusing
Manual focus
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Number of focus points - 25
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 26-130mm (5.0x) 24-600mm (25.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/2.4-4.0
Macro focus range 7cm 3cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 2.7
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Tilting
Display sizing 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of display 230 thousand dots 1,229 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.7x
Features
Min shutter speed 4s 30s
Max shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Max quiet shutter speed - 1/32000s
Continuous shutter rate - 14.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash range 4.80 m 10.80 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, fill-flash, slow sync, rear sync, off
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 3840 x 2160 (30p, 25p, 24p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 24p) ,1440 x 1080 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p)
Highest video resolution 1280x720 3840x2160
Video format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S
Microphone port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless None Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 125 grams (0.28 lb) 1051 grams (2.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 133 x 94 x 127mm (5.2" x 3.7" x 5.0")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested 70
DXO Color Depth score not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range score not tested 12.6
DXO Low light score not tested 472
Other
Battery life 165 images 420 images
Style of battery Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model LI-70B NP-FW50
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, continuous)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $90 $1,398