Clicky

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900

Portability
96
Imaging
37
Features
26
Overall
32
Olympus VG-160 front
 
Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900 front
Portability
96
Imaging
34
Features
30
Overall
32

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 Key Specs

Olympus VG-160
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
  • Introduced January 2012
Sony T900
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3.5" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 35-140mm (F3.5-10.0) lens
  • 143g - 98 x 58 x 16mm
  • Released February 2009
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 Overview

Here, we are comparing the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony T900, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the T900 (12MP) is very close and both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").

Photography Glossary

The VG-160 was announced 2 years later than the T900 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony T900 being a Ultracompact camera.

Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VG-160 scores against the T900 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony T900

 VG-160 T900 
ReleasedJanuary 2012February 2009Fresher by 36 months

Reasons to pick Sony T900 over the Olympus VG-160

 T900 VG-160 
Focus manually Very exact focus
Display size3.5"3"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution922k230kCrisper display (+692k dot)
Touch display Easily navigate

Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony T900

 VG-160 T900 
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Missing selfie screen

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 has got outer dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) and the Sony T900 has sizing of 98mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6") and a weight of 143 grams (0.32 lbs).

Look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony T900 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the VG-160 versus the T900.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and T900 is 96 and 96 respectively.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it's tough to visualize the difference in sensor sizing only by researching technical specs. The visual underneath should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and T900.

As you have seen, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should expect to see the Olympus VG-160 to provide you with more detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics way more aggressively. The younger VG-160 provides an advantage in sensor technology.

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 sensor size comparison

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Portrait photography advice
Sony T900 Portrait photography advice
33
decent MP (14 megapixels)
comes with face detection autofocus
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
27
focusing manually
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Street photography advice
Sony T900 Street photography advice
56
lighter than competition (125 grams)
no moving screen
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
57
has image stabilization (Optical)
no articulating screen
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus VG-160
Sports photography with Sony T900
26
decent MP (14MP)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
terrible battery power (165 CIPA)
does not have phase detect autofocus
24
has image stabilization (Optical)
low maximum shutter speed (1/1,000s)
continuous shooting slow (2.0 fps)
no shutter priority
low resolution (12MP)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Travel photography features
Sony T900 Travel photography features
65
lighter than competition (125 grams)
decent MP (14MP)
has built in flash
really wide (26mm)
missing Timelapse recording
terrible battery power (165 per charge)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
51
has built in flash
no Time Lapse recording
low resolution (12MP)
display is not selfie friendly
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VG-160 as a Landscape photography camera
Sony T900 as a Landscape photography camera
36
really wide (26mm)
screen size is decent (3 inch)
decent MP (14 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
manual exposure not possible
does not have image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
terrible battery power (165 shots)
missing Timelapse recording
36
focusing manually
bigger than average screen (3.5 inch)
has image stabilization (Optical)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual mode
low resolution (12 megapixels)
sensor is small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
no Time Lapse recording
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VG-160 Vlogging features
Sony T900 Vlogging features
30
really wide (26mm)
comes with face detection autofocus
lighter than competition (125 grams)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
doesn't contain selfie friendly screen
does not have image stabilization
video res low (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone jack
28
has touchscreen
has image stabilization (Optical)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pxls)
no mic support
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Olympus VG-160 vs Sony T900 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VG-160 and Sony T900
 Olympus VG-160Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
General Information
Brand Olympus Sony
Model type Olympus VG-160 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-T900
Class Small Sensor Compact Ultracompact
Introduced 2012-01-10 2009-02-17
Physical type Compact Ultracompact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 14 megapixel 12 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Full resolution 4288 x 3216 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 1600 3200
Min native ISO 80 80
RAW format
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detect focusing
Contract detect focusing
Phase detect focusing
Total focus points - 9
Cross type focus points - -
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 35-140mm (4.0x)
Maximum aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.5-10.0
Macro focusing range 7cm -
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3.5 inch
Display resolution 230k dots 922k dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 2 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/1000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate - 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 4.80 m 2.90 m (Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps) 640 x 480 (30 fps)
Max video resolution 1280x720 1280x720
Video file format Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 125g (0.28 lb) 143g (0.32 lb)
Physical dimensions 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") 98 x 58 x 16mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 165 photographs -
Battery style Battery Pack -
Battery ID LI-70B -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal
Card slots 1 1
Price at launch $90 $300