Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
96 Imaging
42 Features
48 Overall
44
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-4.8) lens
- 129g - 96 x 58 x 16mm
- Revealed January 2012
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and TX200V (18MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VG-160 was unveiled at a similar time to the TX200V so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX200V being a Ultracompact camera.
Before diving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the VG-160 grades against the TX200V in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Sony TX200V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony TX200V
| VG-160 | TX200V |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony TX200V over the Olympus VG-160
| TX200V | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3.3" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+1000k dot) |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony TX200V
| VG-160 | TX200V | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2012 |  | January 2012 | Same age |
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VG-160 provides outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony TX200V has sizing of 96mm x 58mm x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") accompanied by a weight of 129 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the VG-160 vs the TX200V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and TX200V is 96 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The graphic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and TX200V.
To sum up, the 2 cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sony TX200V to show extra detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony TX200V Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX200V |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2012-01-30 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | BIONZ |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 64 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-4.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 7cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3.3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 1,230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | 1,229,760 dots equiv. XtraFine TruBlack OLED display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 2 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.10 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125g (0.28 pounds) | 129g (0.28 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 96 x 58 x 16mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photos | 220 photos |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo/Pro-HG Duo |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at launch | $90 | $500 |