Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
96 Imaging
43 Features
41 Overall
42
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Launched January 2012
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 121g - 92 x 52 x 22mm
- Revealed February 2014
Photography Glossary Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Olympus VG-160 and Sony WX220, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a sizeable difference among the image resolutions of the VG-160 (14MP) and WX220 (18MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VG-160 was revealed 3 years earlier than the WX220 which is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony WX220 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief view of how the VG-160 scores versus the WX220 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VG-160 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VG-160 Gallery and Sony WX220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony WX220
| VG-160 | WX220 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Sony WX220 over the Olympus VG-160
| WX220 | VG-160 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2014 |  | January 2012 | Newer by 25 months |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony WX220
| VG-160 | WX220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 has got outside dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony WX220 has dimensions of 92mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") having a weight of 121 grams (0.27 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VG-160 and Sony WX220 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the VG-160 compared to the WX220.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and WX220 is 96 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to see the difference in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The picture here might offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VG-160 and WX220.
All in all, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You should expect the Sony WX220 to provide you with greater detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged VG-160 will be behind in sensor innovation.
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony WX220 Specifications
| Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus VG-160 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-WX220 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-01-10 | 2014-02-12 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | - | Bionz X |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 18 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-250mm (10.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | 7cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 230 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.80 m | 3.70 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, on, slow synchro, off, advanced |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i), 1440 x 1080 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 125 grams (0.28 pounds) | 121 grams (0.27 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 92 x 52 x 22mm (3.6" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 165 photographs | 210 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-70B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, portrait) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/ SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $90 | $198 |
