Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/be47c/be47c879d10e87dc77131ce098d251e311f4e7b3" alt="Sony SLT-A33 front Sony SLT-A33 front"
67 Imaging
54 Features
80 Overall
64
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Bump to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Launched August 2010
- Replacement is Sony A35
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the A33 (14MP) is relatively well matched but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and A33 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
The VG-160 was revealed 17 months after the A33 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony A33 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a short view of how the VG-160 grades vs the A33 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VG-160 & Sony SLT-A33. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Sony A33 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony A33
VG-160 | A33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Newer by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A33 over the Olympus VG-160
A33 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
Screen resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony A33
VG-160 | A33 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
Touch screen | ![]() | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you should factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus VG-160 provides outer measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony A33 has measurements of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") with a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
See the Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have during that time. The following is the front view overall size comparison of the VG-160 compared to the A33.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0bd8b/0bd8b79ed6b88a9765b781abd4776d34a3cbc797" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 size comparison"
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the VG-160 and A33 is 96 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b31b/4b31b542d8918f70e601f8b8689b27ee58f74e91" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to see the difference between sensor dimensions just by looking at specifications. The picture below will provide you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the VG-160 and A33.
To sum up, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact MP albeit not the same sensor dimensions. The VG-160 contains the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field tougher. The fresher VG-160 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7fb73/7fb73f3532454180053e4d985139f33339dac512" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1ad4c/1ad4cb9c2a41e4d1ad6ee8cef325d2f18fe94d77" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A33 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Sony SLT-A33 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus VG-160 | Sony SLT-A33 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-01-10 | 2010-08-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4592 x 3056 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 7cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 7.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 4.80 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) | 500 gr (1.10 lbs) |
Dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 591 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 pictures | 340 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-70B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at release | $90 | $230 |