Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55
96 Imaging
37 Features
26 Overall
32
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1244f/1244f6cc63502fecc34d68bfa599d2a80b917941" alt="Olympus VG-160 front Olympus VG-160 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d01f/6d01f04abf36d4739996d6969e76fa9846c5d0d5" alt="Sony SLT-A55 front Sony SLT-A55 front"
67 Imaging
56 Features
80 Overall
65
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 500g - 124 x 92 x 85mm
- Announced August 2010
- Successor is Sony A57
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Overview
Let's look a little more closely at the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony A55, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the VG-160 (14MP) and the A55 (16MP) is very similar but the VG-160 (1/2.3") and A55 (APS-C) provide different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
The VG-160 was launched 17 months later than the A55 making them a generation apart from each other. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera and the Sony A55 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a quick synopsis of how the VG-160 grades against the A55 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VG-160 & Sony SLT-A55. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VG-160 Gallery & Sony A55 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Sony A55
VG-160 | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2012 | ![]() | August 2010 | Fresher by 17 months |
Reasons to pick Sony A55 over the Olympus VG-160
A55 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+691k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VG-160 and Sony A55
VG-160 | A55 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Touch display | ![]() | Missing Touch display |
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VG-160 provides external dimensions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs) while the Sony A55 has dimensions of 124mm x 92mm x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") having a weight of 500 grams (1.10 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VG-160 versus Sony A55 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the VG-160 vs the A55.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/177a3/177a3ba13c952d9b3c18ed11b0f5ef13011ecaa0" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the VG-160 and A55 is 96 and 67 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/80f4a/80f4a0c814e0023fd15d50264fbb3cf00641c623" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Sensor Comparison
Often, its difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor sizing simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VG-160 and A55.
As you have seen, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VG-160 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make getting bokeh harder and the Sony A55 will offer more detail utilizing its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The fresher VG-160 should have an edge in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6f1f/c6f1f8777671442030ff9a73ccb93050fc7f6e76" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8c50/f8c50d5a589e1cc761d3dee06cf13703c966398c" alt="Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VG-160 vs Sony A55 Specifications
Olympus VG-160 | Sony SLT-A55 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VG-160 | Sony SLT-A55 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-01-10 | 2010-08-24 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4912 x 3264 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 7cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 1,150 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.80 m | 10.00 m (@ ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 29.97 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 125 gr (0.28 lb) | 500 gr (1.10 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 124 x 92 x 85mm (4.9" x 3.6" x 3.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.4 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 816 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 165 photos | 380 photos |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-70B | NP-FW50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $90 | $800 |