Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced February 2011
- Old Model is Olympus VR-320
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom and they are both manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the VR-330 (14MP) is relatively close and both cameras have the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VH-410 was released 19 months after the VR-330 which makes them a generation away from each other. Both of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going right into a complete comparison, here is a simple view of how the VH-410 matches up vs the VR-330 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-410 & Olympus VR-330. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Olympus VR-330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Olympus VR-330
| VH-410 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 |  | February 2011 | More modern by 19 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-330 over the Olympus VH-410
| VR-330 | VH-410 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Olympus VR-330
| VH-410 | VR-330 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus VH-410 offers exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Olympus VR-330 has sizing of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you have attached at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the VH-410 vs the VR-330.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and VR-330 is 95 and 94 respectively.
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes just by researching specifications. The image underneath will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-410 and VR-330.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit different resolution. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to result in extra detail as a result of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a good deal more aggressively. The newer VH-410 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus VH-410 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
| Olympus VH-410 | Olympus VR-330 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Olympus VR-330 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2011-02-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic III+ | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.0-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 4.70 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50B | LI-42B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $186 | $220 |