Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Push to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus VH-410 and Panasonic FS42, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the VH-410 (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") boast totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VH-410 was manufactured 3 years after the FS42 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise overview of how the VH-410 scores vs the FS42 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VH-410 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-410 Gallery and Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Panasonic FS42
VH-410 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | April 2009 | Newer by 41 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus VH-410
FS42 | VH-410 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Panasonic FS42
VH-410 | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focus | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
In case you're intending to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VH-410 provides exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS42 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") and a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VH-410 and Panasonic FS42 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have attached at that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the VH-410 compared to the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d12d2/d12d2e2b062ddbf6acdee67a53d1fbda6fa18d60" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and FS42 is 95 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6d2a/c6d2a03bb502bc48f710ded2b1a0036dd2622366" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be tough to envision the difference between sensor dimensions merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-410 and FS42.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The VH-410 because of its larger sensor will make getting shallower DOF easier and the Olympus VH-410 will resolve more detail due to its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also let you crop images way more aggressively. The more recent VH-410 is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1f91f/1f91f01c4310b28753ec3a66bfda7796285f10ea" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e5e6e/e5e6ec567aa7d181769bb15b9904caca5d6d4ec1" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1000 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.30 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 132 gr (0.29 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $186 | $580 |