Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Announced November 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the VH-410 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe VH-410 was released 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a in depth comparison, here is a quick view of how the VH-410 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-410 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The complete galleries are available at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| VH-410 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | August 2012 |  | November 2009 | Newer by 34 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VH-410
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| VH-410 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera often, you'll need to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VH-410 offers physical measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has proportions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the VH-410 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 95 and 77 respectively.
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its tough to see the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by reviewing specifications. The pic here might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-410 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Plainly, both cameras have different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The VH-410 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh harder and the Olympus VH-410 will offer more detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The fresher VH-410 will have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2009-11-10 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 453g (1.00 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 320 photos |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $186 | $566 |