Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37


90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Released February 2015
- Succeeded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Replacement is Ricoh WG-6

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the WG-5 GPS (16MP) is very close and both cameras posses the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").

The VH-410 was launched 3 years earlier than the WG-5 GPS and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VH-410 matches up versus the WG-5 GPS with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VH-410 & Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The complete galleries are provided at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VH-410 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VH-410
WG-5 GPS | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2015 | ![]() | August 2012 | More recent by 30 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
VH-410 | WG-5 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display sizing |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 460k | The same display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-410 offers external measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has dimensions of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the VH-410 vs the WG-5 GPS.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and WG-5 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to visualise the gap in sensor measurements simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-410 and WG-5 GPS.
As you can see, each of the cameras come with the identical sensor size and the exact same resolution and you can expect comparable quality of photos though you should consider the launch date of the cameras into account. The older VH-410 will be behind when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2015-02-10 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 236 grams (0.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 240 shots |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $186 | $500 |