Clicky

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80

Portability
95
Imaging
39
Features
34
Overall
37
Olympus VH-410 front
 
Ricoh WG-80 front
Portability
91
Imaging
44
Features
35
Overall
40

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs

Olympus VH-410
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
  • 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
  • Revealed August 2012
Ricoh WG-80
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.70" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
  • Introduced May 2022
  • Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview

Its time to look more closely at the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The VH-410 was announced 10 years prior to the WG-80 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the VH-410 scores against the WG-80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

        

Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Ricoh WG-80

 VH-410 WG-80 
Screen size3"2.70"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution460k230kCrisper screen (+230k dot)
Touch friendly screen Quickly navigate

Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus VH-410

 WG-80 VH-410 
IntroducedMay 2022August 2012More modern by 118 months
Focus manually Dial exact focus

Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Ricoh WG-80

 VH-410 WG-80 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison

For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VH-410 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).

Contrast the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VH-410 against the WG-80.

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 top view buttons comparison

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VH-410 and WG-80.

As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos but you should really consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged VH-410 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 sensor size comparison

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus VH-410 Portrait photography advice
Ricoh WG-80 Portrait photography advice
34
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has face detection autofocus
no manual focus
no manual exposure
external flash not possible
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
43
manual focus
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers face detection autofocus
no manual control
no external flash support
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

Street Comparison

Olympus VH-410 Street photography factors
Ricoh WG-80 Street photography factors
63
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
offers touch to focus
screen is fixed
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
55
environment proof
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Sports Comparison

Olympus VH-410 Sports photography factors
Ricoh WG-80 Sports photography factors
40
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
has tracking autofocus
slow frames per second (2.0 frames/s)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
43
megapixel count good (16MP)
offers tracking autofocus
environment proof
lack of shutter priority mode
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect autofocus
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Travel Comparison

Olympus VH-410 Travel photography info
Ricoh WG-80 Travel photography info
68
offers touch to focus
sensor resolution is decent (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
rather wide (26mm)
does not have Timelapse function
screen isn't selfie friendly
slow max aperture (f2.8)
71
environment proof
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
decently wide (28mm)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Landscape Comparison

Olympus VH-410 Landscape photography details
Ricoh WG-80 Landscape photography details
43
rather wide (26mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
sensor resolution is decent (16MP)
no manual focus
cannot change lenses (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f2.8)
no manual exposure
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have RAW format
does not have Timelapse function
44
manual focus
decently wide (28mm)
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
environment proof
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
screen is somewhat small (2.70 inch)
no manual control
lack of image stabilization
very small sensor size (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-410 Vlogging information
Ricoh WG-80 Vlogging information
32
rather wide (26mm)
touch screen
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detection autofocus
slow max aperture (f2.8)
screen isn't selfie friendly
low quality video (1280 x 720 pxls)
does not have external microphone support
31
decently wide (28mm)
offers face detection autofocus
good video quality (1920 x 1080 resolution)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
lack of image stabilization
doesn't have external microphone jack
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus VH-410 and Ricoh WG-80
 Olympus VH-410Ricoh WG-80
General Information
Brand Name Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus VH-410 Ricoh WG-80
Type Small Sensor Compact Waterproof
Revealed 2012-08-21 2022-05-19
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic III+ -
Sensor type CCD BSI-CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 16MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4608 x 3456 4608 x 3456
Highest native ISO 1600 6400
Lowest native ISO 100 125
RAW support
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
AF touch
AF continuous
AF single
AF tracking
Selective AF
AF center weighted
Multi area AF
AF live view
Face detect AF
Contract detect AF
Phase detect AF
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 26-130mm (5.0x) 28-140mm (5.0x)
Largest aperture f/2.8-6.5 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 5cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 5.8
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 2.70 inch
Resolution of display 460k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Display tech TFT Color LCD -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4s 4s
Highest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 2.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 4.70 m 5.50 m (at Auto ISO)
Flash settings Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in On, off
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM
Highest video resolution 1280x720 1920x1080
Video data format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, H.264
Microphone input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless Eye-Fi Connected Built-In
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 152 grams (0.34 lb) 193 grams (0.43 lb)
Physical dimensions 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life - 300 photographs
Form of battery - Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B D-LI92
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote)
Time lapse recording
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card
Storage slots Single Single
Retail cost $186 $300