Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
 
               
              91 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.70" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Introduced May 2022
- Old Model is Ricoh WG-70
 Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes        Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh WG-80, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the WG-80 (16MP) is pretty well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
 Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VH-410 was announced 10 years prior to the WG-80 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before going straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple view of how the VH-410 scores against the WG-80 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
 President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban        Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-410 & Ricoh WG-80. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Ricoh WG-80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Ricoh WG-80
| VH-410 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.70" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | 
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) | 
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate | 
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-80 over the Olympus VH-410
| WG-80 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2022 |  | August 2012 | More modern by 118 months | 
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | 
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Ricoh WG-80
| VH-410 | WG-80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen | 
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | 
Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry around your camera often, you will need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus VH-410 offers outer dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-80 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus VH-410 versus Ricoh WG-80 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the VH-410 against the WG-80.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and WG-80 is 95 and 91 respectively.
 
          Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to visualise the difference between sensor sizes only by checking specs. The image below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the VH-410 and WG-80.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same resolution so you can expect similar quality of photos but you should really consider the age of the products into consideration. The more aged VH-410 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
 
          Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Screen and ViewFinder
 
         Photography Glossary
Photography Glossary        Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
 Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
 Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
 Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
 Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
 Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
 Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
        
                
        Olympus VH-410 vs Ricoh WG-80 Specifications
| Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh WG-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh | 
| Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Ricoh WG-80 | 
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof | 
| Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2022-05-19 | 
| Body design | Compact | Compact | 
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - | 
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS | 
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" | 
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² | 
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP | 
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 | 
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 | 
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 | 
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 | 
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 | 
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens | 
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 | 
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 1cm | 
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 | 
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type | 
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.70 inch | 
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 230k dot | 
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - | 
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None | 
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 4s | 
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s | 
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - | 
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, off | 
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM | 
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 | 
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 | 
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In | 
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | 
| GPS | None | None | 
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) | 
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") | 
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested | 
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested | 
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 300 photographs | 
| Form of battery | - | Battery Pack | 
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 | 
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) | 
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | 
| Storage slots | Single | Single | 
| Retail cost | $186 | $300 | 



