Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Also Known as EX1
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Here is a complete analysis of the Olympus VH-410 and Samsung TL500, both Small Sensor Compact digital cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the VH-410 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") provide different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VH-410 was unveiled 2 years later than the TL500 and that is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a in depth comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the VH-410 scores vs the TL500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-410 and Samsung TL500. The full galleries are available at Olympus VH-410 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Samsung TL500
VH-410 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | July 2010 | Fresher by 26 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Olympus VH-410
TL500 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 460k | Sharper screen (+154k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Samsung TL500
VH-410 | TL500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-410 features exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL500 has dimensions of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Check the Olympus VH-410 and Samsung TL500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the VH-410 versus the TL500.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and TL500 is 95 and 88 respectively.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual here will provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the VH-410 and TL500.
All in all, each of the cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VH-410 having a tinier sensor is going to make shooting bokeh harder and the Olympus VH-410 will give more detail having an extra 6MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The newer VH-410 should have an advantage with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Samsung TL500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Samsung TL500 |
Also called as | - | EX1 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2010-07-09 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/1.8-2.4 |
Macro focusing range | 5cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 614 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1500 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 386g (0.85 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-07A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $186 | $527 |