Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
93 Imaging
39 Features
33 Overall
36
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F3.1-6.3) lens
- 194g - 101 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2014
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F Overview
Below is a in-depth assessment of the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung WB35F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the WB35F (16MP) is relatively well matched and they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VH-410 was manufactured 16 months prior to the WB35F which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the VH-410 matches up versus the WB35F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope Camera Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-410 and Samsung WB35F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-410 Gallery and Samsung WB35F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Samsung WB35F
| VH-410 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) | |
| Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB35F over the Olympus VH-410
| WB35F | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2014 | August 2012 | More recent by 16 months | |
| Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Samsung WB35F
| VH-410 | WB35F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-410 has outside dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Samsung WB35F has dimensions of 101mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 194 grams (0.43 lbs).
See the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung WB35F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. Underneath is the front view scale comparison of the VH-410 compared to the WB35F.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-410 and WB35F is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements only by checking specifications. The graphic below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-410 and WB35F.
Plainly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing and the same resolution therefore you should expect similar quality of files however you should really take the release date of the products into consideration. The older VH-410 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB35F Specifications
| Olympus VH-410 | Samsung WB35F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VH-410 | Samsung WB35F |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.1-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 194 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 101 x 61 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | BP70A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | MicroSD, MicroSDHC, MicroSDXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $186 | $130 |