Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750
95 Imaging
40 Features
34 Overall
37
93 Imaging
37 Features
50 Overall
42
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
(Full Review)
- 13MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 25mm
- Launched September 2011
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung WB750, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and WB750 (13MP) but they possess the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VH-410 was announced 12 months later than the WB750 so they are both of a similar age. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the VH-410 scores against the WB750 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-410 & Samsung WB750. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Samsung WB750 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Samsung WB750
| VH-410 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | August 2012 |  | September 2011 | Fresher by 12 months |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB750 over the Olympus VH-410
| WB750 | VH-410 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Samsung WB750
| VH-410 | WB750 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-410 comes with outside dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB750 has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") having a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung WB750 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Following is the front view overall size comparison of the VH-410 and the WB750.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the VH-410 and WB750 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor sizing just by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-410 and WB750.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Olympus VH-410 to provide you with more detail with its extra 3 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also help you crop pictures far more aggressively. The more modern VH-410 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB750 Specifications
| Olympus VH-410 | Samsung WB750 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VH-410 | Samsung WB750 |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-08-21 | 2011-09-01 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 13 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4096 x 3072 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.30 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | On, Off, Fill, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30/15 fps), 640 x 480 (30/15 fps), 320x 240 fps (30/15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lb) | 193 gr (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 105 x 59 x 25mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $186 | $339 |
