Olympus VH-410 vs Samsung WB800F

Below is a in depth overview of the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung WB800F, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the WB800F (16MP) is very comparable and both cameras have the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The VH-410 was introduced 4 months before the WB800F and they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).

Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the VH-410 scores vs the WB800F in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VH-410 and Samsung WB800F. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VH-410 Gallery and Samsung WB800F Gallery.

If you are aiming to lug around your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus VH-410 comes with exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung WB800F has specifications of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).

Analyze the Olympus VH-410 versus Samsung WB800F in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.

Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is a front view over all size comparison of the VH-410 against the WB800F.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VH-410 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.

Quite often, it is tough to see the difference in sensor measurements just by checking out a spec sheet. The visual below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-410 and WB800F.

As you can see, both of those cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photos but you have to take the production date of the cameras into account.