Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/59f27/59f2779b461c5c1f48d75ee4336ab725697c7831" alt="Olympus VH-410 front Olympus VH-410 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cc9a0/cc9a0ca2125609e674d299e5b8108d0775ff4eee" alt="Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 front"
66 Imaging
54 Features
54 Overall
54
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 549g - 128 x 97 x 86mm
- Announced July 2010
- Replaced the Sony A380
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus VH-410 and Sony A390, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the VH-410 (16MP) and the A390 (14MP) is very well matched but the VH-410 (1/2.3") and A390 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The VH-410 was revealed 2 years after the A390 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera and the Sony A390 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before diving right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the VH-410 grades against the A390 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VH-410 & Sony Alpha DSLR-A390. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VH-410 Gallery & Sony A390 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Sony A390
VH-410 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2012 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 26 months |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Sony A390 over the Olympus VH-410
A390 | VH-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Sony A390
VH-410 | A390 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither offers selfie screen |
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to travel with your camera, you should factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VH-410 offers outside measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony A390 has specifications of 128mm x 97mm x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") and a weight of 549 grams (1.21 lbs).
Check the Olympus VH-410 and Sony A390 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the VH-410 vs the A390.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35727/357273235b94a34422acdcf778ef504618ba8d02" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 size comparison"
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VH-410 and A390 is 95 and 66 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/35ffb/35ffbf4208e1b409350ea38763f4127959519a6c" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's difficult to envision the difference between sensor dimensions purely by reading through specs. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the VH-410 and A390.
All in all, both of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VH-410 having a tinier sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus VH-410 will resolve greater detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos more aggressively. The more recent VH-410 will have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8d988/8d9881465fffcefeb8e0a1b83793064ab6938dcb" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/2e509/2e509c8a51ae7054c9b538c991486e43949d7471" alt="Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony A390 Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Sony Alpha DSLR-A390 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2010-07-28 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3056 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 143 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.49x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Rear Curtain, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 549 grams (1.21 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 128 x 97 x 86mm (5.0" x 3.8" x 3.4") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 66 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.5 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 607 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 230 images |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-FH50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $186 | $500 |