Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1
95 Imaging
39 Features
34 Overall
37
96 Imaging
33 Features
21 Overall
28
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.4" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 35-140mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 142g - 94 x 58 x 17mm
- Released August 2009
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1 Overview
Following is a detailed comparison of the Olympus VH-410 and Sony TX1, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. There is a significant difference among the resolutions of the VH-410 (16MP) and TX1 (10MP) and the VH-410 (1/2.3") and TX1 (1/2.4") have different sensor sizes.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VH-410 was revealed 3 years after the TX1 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have different body design with the Olympus VH-410 being a Compact camera and the Sony TX1 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a full comparison, here is a brief summary of how the VH-410 scores against the TX1 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VH-410 and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-410 Gallery and Sony TX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-410 over the Sony TX1
VH-410 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | August 2009 | More modern by 38 months | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony TX1 over the Olympus VH-410
TX1 | VH-410 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus VH-410 and Sony TX1
VH-410 | TX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | No manual focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display dimensions | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry around your camera frequently, you should think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus VH-410 comes with external dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Sony TX1 has proportions of 94mm x 58mm x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") with a weight of 142 grams (0.31 lbs).
See the Olympus VH-410 and Sony TX1 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you select at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the VH-410 and the TX1.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the VH-410 and TX1 is 95 and 96 respectively.
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizes just by looking through a spec sheet. The image underneath might give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-410 and TX1.
Clearly, each of these cameras provide different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VH-410 using its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus VH-410 will render more detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively. The more modern VH-410 provides an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VH-410 vs Sony TX1 Specifications
Olympus VH-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus VH-410 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX1 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2009-08-06 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.4" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.104 x 4.578mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 35-140mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 8cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1250 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 gr (0.34 lbs) | 142 gr (0.31 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 94 x 58 x 17mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $186 | $350 |