Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
55 Imaging
51 Features
80 Overall
62
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Released August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Introduced June 2014
- Refreshed by Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus VH-515 versus Panasonic FZ1000, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Large Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference among the sensor resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the VH-515 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") possess totally different sensor dimensions.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe VH-515 was introduced 22 months before the FZ1000 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a short summation of how the VH-515 grades versus the FZ1000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-515 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Panasonic FZ1000
VH-515 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus VH-515
FZ1000 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2014 | August 2012 | More modern by 22 months | |
Manually focus | More accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Panasonic FZ1000
VH-515 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to carry around your camera often, you will need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-515 offers external measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") accompanied by a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Panasonic FZ1000 has dimensions of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") along with a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VH-515 versus Panasonic FZ1000 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the VH-515 vs the FZ1000.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and FZ1000 is 95 and 55 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to see the difference in sensor sizes purely by researching specs. The image here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and FZ1000.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VH-515 using its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field harder and the Panasonic FZ1000 will result in more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures somewhat more aggressively. The more aged VH-515 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VH-515 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Released | 2012-08-21 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 20 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 831g (1.83 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $648 | $800 |