Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
39 Features
37 Overall
38
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Announced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 198g - 122 x 61 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2012
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus VH-515 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Waterproof by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and WG-2 GPS (16MP) but they come with the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe VH-515 was announced 7 months after the WG-2 GPS which means that they are of a similar age. Both of these cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before we go in to a complete comparison, below is a short summary of how the VH-515 scores vs the WG-2 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-515 & Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Pentax WG-2 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Pentax WG-2 GPS
VH-515 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | February 2012 | Newer by 7 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax WG-2 GPS over the Olympus VH-515
WG-2 GPS | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Pentax WG-2 GPS
VH-515 | WG-2 GPS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera, you are going to need to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus VH-515 provides external dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Pentax WG-2 GPS has measurements of 122mm x 61mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") having a weight of 198 grams (0.44 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VH-515 versus Pentax WG-2 GPS in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the VH-515 vs the WG-2 GPS.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the VH-515 and WG-2 GPS is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very hard to visualize the gap in sensor dimensions merely by viewing specs. The picture here may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-515 and WG-2 GPS.
As you can plainly see, the two cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can count on the Pentax WG-2 GPS to provide you with greater detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The more recent VH-515 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax WG-2 GPS Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Pentax |
Model | Olympus VH-515 | Pentax Optio WG-2 GPS |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
Announced | 2012-08-21 | 2012-02-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | Widescreen TFT color LCD with anti-reflective coating |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames/s | 1.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.40 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Soft |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 198g (0.44 lb) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 122 x 61 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 260 photographs |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $648 | $300 |