Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


71 Imaging
34 Features
34 Overall
34
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 50 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-624mm (F2.8-5.0) lens
- 410g - 110 x 83 x 90mm
- Launched March 2009

Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70 Overview
Below, we are reviewing the Olympus VH-515 and Pentax X70, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Pentax. The sensor resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the X70 (12MP) is fairly comparable and they use the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").

The VH-515 was unveiled 3 years after the X70 which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera and the Pentax X70 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting through a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the VH-515 matches up versus the X70 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VH-515 and Pentax X70. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Pentax X70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Pentax X70
VH-515 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | March 2009 | More modern by 43 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Pentax X70 over the Olympus VH-515
X70 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Pentax X70
VH-515 | X70 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera often, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VH-515 has got physical measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Pentax X70 has measurements of 110mm x 83mm x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VH-515 and Pentax X70 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the VH-515 versus the X70.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and X70 is 95 and 71 respectively.

Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes only by going through specifications. The pic below may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and X70.
Plainly, both of the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements and the same megapixels so you should expect comparable quality of photos although you should really consider the production date of the cameras into account. The younger VH-515 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-515 vs Pentax X70 Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Pentax X70 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Pentax X70 |
Type | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2009-03-02 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 26-624mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.0 |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | 10cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 9.10 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 110 x 83 x 90mm (4.3" x 3.3" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $648 | $200 |