Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
93 Imaging
32 Features
30 Overall
31
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-200mm (F3.3-5.2) lens
- 180g - 102 x 58 x 28mm
- Released February 2009
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 Overview
Its time to look closer at the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizeable gap among the resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and CX1 (9MP) but both cameras have the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe VH-515 was introduced 3 years later than the CX1 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a simple summary of how the VH-515 grades vs the CX1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh CX1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Ricoh CX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh CX1
VH-515 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | August 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX1 over the Olympus VH-515
CX1 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh CX1
VH-515 | CX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus VH-515 comes with physical measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX1 has proportions of 102mm x 58mm x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 180 grams (0.40 lbs).
See the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you use at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the VH-515 and the CX1.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VH-515 and CX1 is 95 and 93 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizing just by viewing specs. The visual underneath will help give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and CX1.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should count on the Olympus VH-515 to result in extra detail using its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The more modern VH-515 provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh CX1 Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh CX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh CX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2009-02-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 9 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-200mm (7.1x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.3-5.2 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 8 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lb) | 180 grams (0.40 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 102 x 58 x 28mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Pricing at launch | $648 | $299 |