Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Revealed November 2009

Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Lets look closer at the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, one is a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. The sensor resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is pretty close but the VH-515 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) feature different sensor measurements.

The VH-515 was revealed 2 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick overview of how the VH-515 scores vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VH-515 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | August 2012 | ![]() | November 2009 | More modern by 34 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus VH-515
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very exact focus | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
VH-515 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurements |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-515 has got outer measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has dimensions of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the VH-515 against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 95 and 77 respectively.

Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is hard to imagine the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching technical specs. The image underneath may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
As you have seen, both cameras posses the exact same megapixel count albeit different sensor sizes. The VH-515 offers the smaller sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field harder. The fresher VH-515 should have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.

Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2009-11-10 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III+ | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 3.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 lbs) | 453 grams (1.00 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 photographs |
Battery type | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $648 | $566 |