Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe VH-515 was unveiled 17 months earlier than the WG-4 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the VH-515 scores versus the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VH-515 & Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh WG-4
| VH-515 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus VH-515
| WG-4 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 | August 2012 | More recent by 17 months | |
| Manually focus | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-4
| VH-515 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display dimensions | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Exact same display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VH-515 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the VH-515 vs the WG-4.

Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VH-515 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-515 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older VH-515 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $648 | $330 |