Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
90 Imaging
39 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Released February 2014
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-4, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and WG-4 (16MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VH-515 was unveiled 17 months earlier than the WG-4 making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief overview of how the VH-515 scores versus the WG-4 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VH-515 & Ricoh WG-4. The full galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh WG-4
| VH-515 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 over the Olympus VH-515
| WG-4 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2014 |  | August 2012 | More recent by 17 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-4
| VH-515 | WG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display dimensions |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same display resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Physical Comparison
If you're planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus VH-515 has got exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 has specifications of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-4 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the VH-515 vs the WG-4.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the VH-515 and WG-4 is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by going over specs. The visual underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-515 and WG-4.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You can anticipate the Ricoh WG-4 to deliver extra detail having an extra 4MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The older VH-515 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-4 Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-4 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2014-02-05 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lb) | 230g (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 photos |
| Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $648 | $330 |