Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
90 Imaging
40 Features
44 Overall
41
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 236g - 125 x 65 x 32mm
- Launched February 2015
- Superseded the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-6
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Waterproof by brands Olympus and Ricoh. There is a crucial difference between the resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and WG-5 GPS (16MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe VH-515 was announced 3 years before the WG-5 GPS and that is quite a serious gap as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a detailed comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the VH-515 grades against the WG-5 GPS in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Ricoh WG-5 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| VH-515 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-5 GPS over the Olympus VH-515
| WG-5 GPS | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | February 2015 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 30 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-5 GPS
| VH-515 | WG-5 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Exact same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Physical Comparison
In case you're aiming to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus VH-515 features external measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-5 GPS has measurements of 125mm x 65mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") with a weight of 236 grams (0.52 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are utilising during that time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the VH-515 against the WG-5 GPS.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and WG-5 GPS is 95 and 90 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very tough to visualize the gap between sensor sizing just by checking a spec sheet. The visual here will offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and WG-5 GPS.
Clearly, the two cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Ricoh WG-5 GPS to give greater detail with its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures a bit more aggressively. The older VH-515 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-5 GPS Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-5 GPS |
| Type | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2015-02-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focus range | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 14.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 10.40 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 pounds) | 236g (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 125 x 65 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 shots |
| Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $648 | $500 |