Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
89 Imaging
47 Features
46 Overall
46
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 246g - 118 x 66 x 33mm
- Released February 2018
- Replaced the Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6 Overview
On this page, we are looking at the Olympus VH-515 versus Ricoh WG-6, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There is a huge difference between the image resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and WG-6 (20MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VH-515 was announced 6 years before the WG-6 and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the VH-515 grades against the WG-6 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-6. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Ricoh WG-6 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Ricoh WG-6
| VH-515 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-6 over the Olympus VH-515
| WG-6 | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2018 |  | August 2012 | Fresher by 67 months |
| Manually focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display resolution | 1040k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+580k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Ricoh WG-6
| VH-515 | WG-6 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera often, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus VH-515 has got outside measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-6 has sizing of 118mm x 66mm x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") along with a weight of 246 grams (0.54 lbs).
Check the Olympus VH-515 versus Ricoh WG-6 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the VH-515 vs the WG-6.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the VH-515 and WG-6 is 95 and 89 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it can be hard to envision the difference between sensor sizing just by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath will give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and WG-6.
As you have seen, both of these cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but not the same MP. You should anticipate the Ricoh WG-6 to offer greater detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop images more aggressively. The older VH-515 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus VH-515 vs Ricoh WG-6 Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-6 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus VH-515 | Ricoh WG-6 |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2018-02-21 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5184 x 3888 |
| Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 1,040 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 4 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.50 m (with Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Flash on, flash off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 3840x2160 |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Supports FlashAir SD cards |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | DB-110 lithium-ion battery & USB charger |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 246g (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 118 x 66 x 33mm (4.6" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 340 shots |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $648 | $271 |
