Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Released June 2010
- Alternative Name is WB650
Photography Glossary Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Following is a detailed overview of the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung HZ35W, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is relatively similar and both cameras provide the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe VH-515 was unveiled 2 years after the HZ35W which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a brief view of how the VH-515 grades versus the HZ35W in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-515 & Samsung HZ35W. The full galleries are available at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Samsung HZ35W
| VH-515 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 |  | June 2010 | More modern by 27 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus VH-515
| HZ35W | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial exact focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+154k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung HZ35W
| VH-515 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're going to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus VH-515 provides exterior measurements of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung HZ35W in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you choose at the time. Underneath is a front view physical size comparison of the VH-515 vs the HZ35W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VH-515 and HZ35W is 95 and 91 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualize the difference between sensor sizes only by going over technical specs. The pic below will help offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the VH-515 and HZ35W.
As you have seen, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size and the same megapixels so you can expect similar quality of photographs although you should really factor the age of the products into consideration. The younger VH-515 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also Known as | - | WB650 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-08-21 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 5cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 614k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 152 gr (0.34 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $648 | $300 |
