Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


94 Imaging
33 Features
47 Overall
38
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-120mm (F2.4-5.8) lens
- 195g - 100 x 59 x 22mm
- Launched February 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB2000

Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350 Overview
Below, we will be analyzing the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung TL350, both Small Sensor Compact cameras by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the VH-515 (12MP) and the TL350 (10MP) is relatively close and they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").

The VH-515 was brought out 2 years after the TL350 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple summary of how the VH-515 scores vs the TL350 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus VH-515 and Samsung TL350. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-515 Gallery and Samsung TL350 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Samsung TL350
VH-515 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | February 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL350 over the Olympus VH-515
TL350 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Screen resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Sharper screen (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung TL350
VH-515 | TL350 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Screen dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical screen measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-515 enjoys exterior dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") along with a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung TL350 has dimensions of 100mm x 59mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 195 grams (0.43 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung TL350 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the VH-515 vs the TL350.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VH-515 and TL350 is 95 and 94 respectively.

Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the difference in sensor dimensions just by viewing technical specs. The pic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VH-515 and TL350.
As you can tell, both the cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different MP. You should count on the Olympus VH-515 to provide you with more detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The more modern VH-515 should have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.

Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung TL350 Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL350 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung TL350 |
Also Known as | - | WB2000 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2010-02-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.4-5.8 |
Macro focus range | 5cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 16 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.20 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 608 x 342 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps), 138 x 78 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 152g (0.34 lbs) | 195g (0.43 lbs) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 100 x 59 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Retail cost | $648 | $400 |