Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F
95 Imaging
35 Features
34 Overall
34
92 Imaging
39 Features
51 Overall
43
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Revealed August 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Here is a detailed comparison of the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung WB800F, former being a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras provide the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe VH-515 was released 4 months prior to the WB800F so they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go into a thorough comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VH-515 matches up against the WB800F in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-515 & Samsung WB800F. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Samsung WB800F
| VH-515 | WB800F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus VH-515
| WB800F | VH-515 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung WB800F
| VH-515 | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | August 2012 | January 2013 | Similar age | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
| Screen resolution | 460k | 460k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you'll need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VH-515 has got outside dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") having a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus VH-515 and Samsung WB800F in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you choose during that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the VH-515 compared to the WB800F.

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VH-515 and WB800F is 95 and 92 respectively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to picture the gap between sensor sizing simply by reading a spec sheet. The photograph underneath will help offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-515 and WB800F.
Clearly, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to offer extra detail as a result of its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs more aggressively.
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus VH-515 vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus VH-515 | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Samsung WB800F |
| Category | Small Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-08-21 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic III+ | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
| Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 16s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at launch | $648 | $300 |