Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9
95 Imaging
36 Features
34 Overall
35


54 Imaging
38 Features
27 Overall
33
Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 152g - 102 x 60 x 21mm
- Introduced August 2012
(Full Review)
- 3MP - APS-C Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400
- 1/6000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 950g - 152 x 120 x 79mm
- Launched November 2002
- Successor is Sigma SD10

Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9 Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus VH-515 versus Sigma SD9, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by brands Olympus and Sigma. There exists a considerable gap between the image resolutions of the VH-515 (12MP) and SD9 (3MP) and the VH-515 (1/2.3") and SD9 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.

The VH-515 was manufactured 9 years after the SD9 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VH-515 being a Compact camera and the Sigma SD9 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a detailed comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the VH-515 matches up versus the SD9 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VH-515 & Sigma SD9. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VH-515 Gallery & Sigma SD9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VH-515 over the Sigma SD9
VH-515 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | August 2012 | ![]() | November 2002 | More modern by 119 months |
Screen sizing | 3" | ![]() | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
Screen resolution | 460k | ![]() | 130k | Crisper screen (+330k dot) |
Touch screen | ![]() | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD9 over the Olympus VH-515
SD9 | VH-515 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VH-515 and Sigma SD9
VH-515 | SD9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed screen |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera often, you're going to have to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VH-515 enjoys physical dimensions of 102mm x 60mm x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") and a weight of 152 grams (0.34 lbs) and the Sigma SD9 has dimensions of 152mm x 120mm x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") having a weight of 950 grams (2.09 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VH-515 versus Sigma SD9 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you use at that moment. Below is the front view dimensions comparison of the VH-515 versus the SD9.

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VH-515 and SD9 is 95 and 54 respectively.

Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be difficult to visualize the gap between sensor sizes merely by reading specifications. The picture here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the VH-515 and SD9.
To sum up, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The VH-515 featuring a tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Olympus VH-515 will deliver extra detail due to its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The younger VH-515 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.

Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VH-515 vs Sigma SD9 Specifications
Olympus VH-515 | Sigma SD9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus VH-515 | Sigma SD9 |
Class | Small Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-08-21 | 2002-11-26 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III+ | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 20.7 x 13.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 285.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 3MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 2268 x 1512 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 5cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 1.8 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dots | 130 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 98% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.77x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/6000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 2.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 152 grams (0.34 pounds) | 950 grams (2.09 pounds) |
Dimensions | 102 x 60 x 21mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 0.8") | 152 x 120 x 79mm (6.0" x 4.7" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash Type I or II |
Card slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $648 | $3,001 |