Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9d8da/9d8da4d616e0872484d1d6071e9a9d7184378d49" alt="Olympus XZ-1 front Olympus XZ-1 front"
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Revealed July 2011
- Replacement is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Introduced January 2011
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
Below is a comprehensive assessment of the Olympus VR-320 and Olympus XZ-1, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are offered by Olympus. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and XZ-1 (1/1.63") provide different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The VR-320 was introduced 6 months later than the XZ-1 and they are both of a similar generation. The two cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a quick summation of how the VR-320 scores against the XZ-1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 and Olympus XZ-1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Olympus XZ-1
VR-320 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Olympus VR-320
XZ-1 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Very precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Olympus XZ-1
VR-320 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2011 | Similar generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 comes with outer measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Look at the Olympus VR-320 and Olympus XZ-1 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are utilizing at the time. The following is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 against the XZ-1.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6c507/6c507962942f1581da0524064f6f4c25c268125b" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and XZ-1 is 94 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9b09/f9b098408a3dc59cb3b279975ca35953d42760d4" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Usually, its difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements simply by going over specifications. The photograph below will help offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and XZ-1.
Plainly, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The VR-320 with its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallower DOF tougher and the Olympus VR-320 will offer more detail using its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop pics more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c08b5/c08b56bbad052538932f5e92c21ec62dc22f38d7" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/25f44/25f44a36f63ec5370fbf814a647883325851a90b" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2011-07-19 | 2011-01-26 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic III | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.63" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 614k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 275g (0.61 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 34 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $179 | $567 |