Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47619/47619e6b1ac91a51a7449bd9802860c5373c0a46" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 front"
95 Imaging
34 Features
24 Overall
30
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Newer Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 29-145mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 148g - 97 x 58 x 22mm
- Released January 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FS25, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The image resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the FS25 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The VR-320 was manufactured 2 years later than the FS25 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple overview of how the VR-320 scores vs the FS25 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Panasonic FS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic FS25
VR-320 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2011 | ![]() | January 2009 | Fresher by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS25 over the Olympus VR-320
FS25 | VR-320 |
---|
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FS25
VR-320 | FS25 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Lack of manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurements |
Display resolution | 230k | ![]() | 230k | Equal display resolution |
Selfie screen | ![]() | No selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | No Touch display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry your camera, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus VR-320 features outside measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FS25 has measurements of 97mm x 58mm x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") along with a weight of 148 grams (0.33 lbs).
Check the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FS25 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are using at that moment. Here is a front view proportions comparison of the VR-320 versus the FS25.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab49d/ab49dba6f8e0d109808d8b6a5413def7ff6cfcd7" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 size comparison"
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability score of the VR-320 and FS25 is 94 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1473f/1473f295f1bbc24a2e6b5c7acd5a34ed0e48be5f" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very tough to see the contrast between sensor sizing merely by reviewing technical specs. The visual underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and FS25.
As you can tell, both cameras feature the identical sensor size but not the same MP. You can anticipate the Olympus VR-320 to deliver greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop images way more aggressively. The newer VR-320 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ce4c/7ce4c01fd0b3467e84085abb039329a83119e54b" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ec494/ec494e3f090086efc6196c0ecc60b0b7ccc810e8" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FS25 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS25 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2009-01-27 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic III | - |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Peak resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 1600 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 29-145mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 230k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 5.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1280x720 | 640x480 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158 grams (0.35 pounds) | 148 grams (0.33 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 97 x 58 x 22mm (3.8" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Cost at release | $179 | $230 |