Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
55 Imaging
52 Features
80 Overall
63
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- Updated by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Increase to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 25-400mm (F2.8-4.0) lens
- 831g - 137 x 99 x 131mm
- Revealed June 2014
- New Model is Panasonic FZ2500
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a large gap among the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and FZ1000 (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and FZ1000 (1") use totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe VR-320 was announced 3 years prior to the FZ1000 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ1000 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before diving through a more detailed comparison, below is a brief view of how the VR-320 scores versus the FZ1000 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Panasonic FZ1000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic FZ1000
VR-320 | FZ1000 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ1000 over the Olympus VR-320
FZ1000 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | June 2014 | July 2011 | Fresher by 35 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FZ1000
VR-320 | FZ1000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display sizing | |
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Physical Comparison
For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus VR-320 comes with external measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ1000 has specifications of 137mm x 99mm x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") having a weight of 831 grams (1.83 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view scale comparison of the VR-320 versus the FZ1000.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and FZ1000 is 94 and 55 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing purely by going through specs. The visual below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the VR-320 and FZ1000.
As you can plainly see, both the cameras offer different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 having a smaller sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more challenging and the Panasonic FZ1000 will provide more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics a little more aggressively. The older VR-320 will be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ1000 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ1000 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2014-06-12 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW format | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 25-400mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.0 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 921k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 4.70 m | 13.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 3840x2160 (30p), 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p) 1280x720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30p) |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 831g (1.83 lbs) |
Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 137 x 99 x 131mm (5.4" x 3.9" x 5.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 22.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 11.7 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 517 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 photos |
Type of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12PP |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | - |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $179 | $800 |