Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36


53 Imaging
52 Features
81 Overall
63
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced July 2011
- Successor is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Push to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Announced September 2016
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Previous Model is Panasonic FZ1000

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
The following is a comprehensive comparison of the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic FZ2500, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by companies Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizeable gap between the resolutions of the VR-320 (14MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the VR-320 (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") provide different sensor sizing.

The VR-320 was brought out 6 years prior to the FZ2500 which is quite a large gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before getting right into a full comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the VR-320 scores against the FZ2500 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The entire galleries are available at Olympus VR-320 Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic FZ2500
VR-320 | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus VR-320
FZ2500 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | ![]() | July 2011 | Newer by 62 months |
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial exact focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display resolution | 1040k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+810k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FZ2500
VR-320 | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera, you're going to have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus VR-320 offers external dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Compare the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic FZ2500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the VR-320 compared to the FZ2500.

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and FZ2500 is 94 and 53 respectively.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to picture the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing specs. The pic below might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and FZ2500.
All in all, both cameras come with different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The VR-320 due to its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field tougher and the Panasonic FZ2500 will offer you greater detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged VR-320 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder


Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison

Street Comparison

Sports Comparison

Travel Comparison

Landscape Comparison

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2011-07-19 | 2016-09-19 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 12800 |
Max boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Display resolution | 230k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display tech | TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 12.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158 gr (0.35 pounds) | 915 gr (2.02 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photographs |
Battery form | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail price | $179 | $998 |