Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
72 Imaging
34 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced July 2011
- New Model is Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Revealed July 2010
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-FZ38
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35, both Small Sensor Superzoom cameras by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the FZ35 (12MP) is pretty close and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe VR-320 was manufactured 13 months after the FZ35 which makes the cameras a generation away from each other. Both of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick overview of how the VR-320 grades vs the FZ35 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photography Glossary Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus VR-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic FZ35
| VR-320 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2011 | July 2010 | More modern by 13 months | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus VR-320
| FZ35 | VR-320 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic FZ35
| VR-320 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | Same screen resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 features exterior measurements of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has dimensions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Check out the Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the VR-320 against the FZ35.

Looking at size and weight, the portability grade of the VR-320 and FZ35 is 94 and 72 respectively.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its tough to see the difference in sensor sizes merely by looking through technical specs. The image underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the VR-320 and FZ35.
As you can tell, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus VR-320 to result in more detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The fresher VR-320 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Also referred to as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2011-07-19 | 2010-07-06 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic III | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display technology | TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.70 m | 8.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 158g (0.35 lbs) | 397g (0.88 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $179 | $999 |