Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3
94 Imaging
37 Features
35 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7e98/b7e986b748f8a3574682ef0ffce60a8d7bbbe4e3" alt="Olympus VR-320 front Olympus VR-320 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d922/3d92276b7d9e74705fc702679568ccbb33cc2193" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 front"
90 Imaging
48 Features
48 Overall
48
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched July 2011
- Refreshed by Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 264g - 108 x 67 x 32mm
- Introduced August 2011
- Older Model is Panasonic GF2
- New Model is Panasonic GF5
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Overview
Here is a in-depth comparison of the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic GF3, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the VR-320 (14MP) and the GF3 (12MP) is very close but the VR-320 (1/2.3") and GF3 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The VR-320 was brought out very close to the GF3 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus VR-320 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF3 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going right into a full comparison, here is a simple summation of how the VR-320 grades vs the GF3 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus VR-320 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus VR-320 Gallery & Panasonic GF3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus VR-320 over the Panasonic GF3
VR-320 | GF3 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF3 over the Olympus VR-320
GF3 | VR-320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More exact focusing | ||
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus VR-320 and Panasonic GF3
VR-320 | GF3 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | July 2011 | ![]() | August 2011 | Same age |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimensions | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Equal display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus VR-320 offers outside dimensions of 101mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") and a weight of 158 grams (0.35 lbs) while the Panasonic GF3 has dimensions of 108mm x 67mm x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") having a weight of 264 grams (0.58 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus VR-320 versus Panasonic GF3 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Underneath is a front view overall size comparison of the VR-320 versus the GF3.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/449f4/449f4fc83f01b145dc45e60971dc71a061c4b34f" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 size comparison"
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the VR-320 and GF3 is 94 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/db565/db565b5e7926e85092db88002387d6fc0e70395c" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to envision the gap in sensor sizing just by looking through technical specs. The graphic here may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the VR-320 and GF3.
As you can tell, both the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The VR-320 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus VR-320 will result in greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop pics a bit more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/10845/10845fab41525c04c66d6b1543a8e04bb3396fb1" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 sensor size comparison"
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/74de7/74de793541bda5e9eda00a96bab8061375e0cc22" alt="Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus VR-320 vs Panasonic GF3 Specifications
Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus VR-320 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF3 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-07-19 | 2011-08-11 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic III | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4288 x 3216 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 160 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 24-300mm (12.5x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display technology | TFT Color LCD | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 4.70 m | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 158g (0.35 pounds) | 264g (0.58 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 108 x 67 x 32mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 50 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.1 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 459 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 300 pictures |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-42B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at release | $179 | $360 |